Printed 2026 · figures read October 2026
Pragmatic slots span 64p across the whole published range, and one of their own ladders is worth five times that
What a studio’s entire published range is worth across one bonus’s staking. Sixteen of its titles carry figures between 96.71 per cent and 96.07, a span of 0.64 points, and £1,600.00 of turnover converts that span into £10.24. One title’s own ladder of settings is worth £33.76 on the same money.
The ranked packages, and the turnover each one demands
Every link in this rack is a paid placement, and this site is owed a fee when a reader opens an account through one.
Betportal
Lowest wagering
Licence Licensed in Anjouan, Comoros, no Great Britain licence, run by BetPortal Gaming Ltd and Excite Ultra Media Ltd, reference ALSI-202601040-FI2.
WinBeast
Free bet included
Licence Licensed in Curaçao, no Great Britain licence, operator not named on the site.
EliteSpin
New for 2026
Licence Licensed in Costa Rica, no Great Britain licence, run by PrimeTier Limited, opened 2026.
Crown Jewelz
200% first deposit
Licence Licensed in Curaçao, number not verified, no Great Britain licence, operator not named on the site.
Scroll the rack sideways to reach the other columns. The label column stays put.
Not one of the offers printed above holds a Great Britain licence. Outside that licence a British player has none of its protection: Gamstop Online cannot shut the door, the ten-times limit on bonus wagering does not bind the operator, and no British complaints body will take up a dispute. You must be 18 or over to open an account anywhere in this rack.
Every figure in the rack is a term the operator itself publishes, read on 14 October 2026. The operator's terms in full are the ones that bind you.
Sixteen titles from one studio, against one credit
| What these offers ask | Under a British licence | |
|---|---|---|
| You put in | £20.00 | £20.00 |
| Handed over | £40.00 | £40.00 |
| Wagering | 40x | 10x |
| Cost per £1 kept | £1.32 | £0.33 |
Both bottom cells use 96.71 per cent, the highest figure this studio publishes, and both are rounded up from £1.316 and £0.329 so that neither side is flattered. On the studio’s lowest published figure, 96.07 per cent, the same cells read £1.57 and £0.39. A floor of £20.00 and an opening match of 200 per cent put £40.00 into the account, which forty times turns into £1,600.00 to be staked. The studio’s percentages were taken down in October 2026, with nothing opened since, so they stand as published and not as fresh. The maker holds a British supplier licence; no Great Britain operator licence stands behind a cashier of this kind, so the right-hand column is a measure and nothing more.
01
The maker of the reels is licensed in Britain and the cashiers showing them are not
£1,600.00 of turnover, and sixteen titles from one studio to put it through. Every title this studio publishes a figure for is a reel, so every one of them counts towards the turnover on packages like these. Those titles are games the credit can be worked off on, which is the plain commercial fact about this sheet.
The company behind them keeps its head office in Gibraltar. Over 30 jurisdictions is the figure it gives for where its games are certified or licensed, and its catalogue runs to slots, live casino, jackpots, crash and arcade games alongside a tournament brand. Its Gibraltar entity carries Gambling Commission account number 56015 and a Gibraltar licence numbered RGL 107, and both are supplier permissions rather than operator ones.
So the maker of the reels holds a British licence while the cashiers showing them hold none, which is a distinction worth holding on to. A supplier licence governs the games. An operator licence governs the account, the money and the terms. A reader who recognises the studio has learned something about the software and nothing whatever about the cashier.
What the cashiers lack is specific. A Curacao permission, an Anjouan one or a Costa Rican one, and no cap on wagering anywhere among them. No self-exclusion scheme reaches those accounts. No independent adjudicator closes a dispute. No regulator holds power over the cashier. The price line prices only the wagering, and the other three cannot be put into pounds at all.
02
Seven published figures cover sixteen titles, and they span 64p
£52.64 at the top and £62.88 at the bottom. The table takes every distinct figure the studio publishes across the sixteen titles this press holds numbers for, counts the titles carrying each, and runs the turnover in the price line across all seven, then runs the turnover a British ceiling of ten would set instead.
| Published figure | Titles carrying it | Bill on the turnover here | Bill at a ceiling of ten |
|---|---|---|---|
| 96.71% | 3 | £52.64 | £13.16 |
| 96.70% | 1 | £52.80 | £13.20 |
| 96.53% | 2 | £55.52 | £13.88 |
| 96.52% | 1 | £55.68 | £13.92 |
| 96.51% | 2 | £55.84 | £13.96 |
| 96.50% | 4 | £56.00 | £14.00 |
| 96.07% | 3 | £62.88 | £15.72 |
Thirteen of the sixteen sit inside 0.21 of a percentage point, between 96.50 and 96.71, which over this turnover is £3.36. The three at 96.07 carry the rest of the 64p on their own. So the choice between this studio’s titles is effectively a choice between two prices, and one of them applies to three games out of sixteen.
Four of the figures are separated by a hundredth of a percentage point. 96.53, 96.52, 96.51 and 96.50 differ by 16p apiece across £1,600.00 of turnover, which is the level of precision a list of defaults can offer and a reader can safely ignore.
03
One title’s own ladder is worth more than the gap between any two titles
£33.76 is the figure that outranks the whole range. This studio’s most familiar reel is published at 96.71 per cent at the top, with 95.67 and 94.60 also listed for the same title, so the bill on £1,600.00 of turnover comes to £52.64, £69.28 and £86.40 in turn. Three prices, one name, one grid.
Set that against the table above. Picking the dearest of the sixteen titles over the cheapest costs £10.24. Opening the lowest published build of the cheapest title costs £33.76. The decision a ranking helps with is worth under a third of the decision nobody publishes.
Only one of those two decisions is answerable before a deposit, and only at a British-licensed site. The payback of the installed copy, or the probability of a winning event instead, has to be reachable there before a customer commits to gamble. At a cashier without that licence the figure displayed is whatever the lobby decides to display, and this press cannot price a copy nobody has published.
Where the studio leaves a field blank these pages record the gap and do not fill it. One volatility entry for this studio’s headline reel came from a brief rather than a provider page, so no volatility is printed for it anywhere in these pages.
04
Eight releases in five years, with the ceiling up twelvefold and the payback flat
A ceiling of 2,100x on the first title became 25,000x on the eighth, a climb of nearly twelve times, while the payback moved from 96.71 per cent to 96.52, which is down by 0.19. The table is the run as a ladder of rungs, with each ceiling converted at ten pence a spin.
| Published ceiling | Ceiling at 10p | Payback on that rung | Bill on the turnover | What is on that rung |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,100x | £210.00 | 96.71% | £52.64 | The title that opened the run, December 2020 |
| 4,000x | £400.00 | 96.71% | £52.64 | Its first sequel, September 2021 |
| 5,000x | £500.00 | 96.71% | £52.64 | A third outing, June 2022 |
| 10,000x | £1,000.00 | 96.07% | £62.88 | Three titles, October 2022 to March 2024 |
| 20,000x | £2,000.00 | 96.51% | £55.84 | A rebuild, April 2025 |
| 25,000x | £2,500.00 | 96.52% | £55.68 | The newest of the eight, December 2025 |
Big Bass Bonanza opened it in December 2020. Bigger Bass Bonanza followed in September 2021 and Big Bass Splash in June 2022. Then came Big Bass Keeping it Reel, Big Bass Hold and Spinner and Big Bass Day at the Races, between October 2022 and March 2024. Big Bass Bonanza 1000 arrived in April 2025 and Big Bass Splash 1000 in December 2025.
The three dearest titles in the whole range sit on the fourth rung, each one at 96.07 per cent. They are also the three that first reached a ceiling of 10,000x. So on this evidence the ceiling went up and the price of the turnover went up with it, which is the opposite of the trade a bigger headline implies.
No published frequency attaches to any of those ceilings. A ceiling is one outcome with no probability beside it, so column two is a ladder of upper bounds and belongs in no bill. Payback is the reading that prices the staking, and across the eight titles it moves 64p on £1,600.00.
05
A bigger feature is inside the percentage, not beside it
Five more free spins on every tier, between the first title in the series and the newest on this press’s sheet. The drawing sets the two side by side. The newest is dated 24 September 2026 and publishes 96.53 per cent with money symbols reaching 1,000x; the original is dated December 2020, publishes 96.71 per cent and reaches 2,000x.
Not one of those five extra spins is a discount. A feature sits inside the published payback rather than beside it, so a larger feature on a title published at a lower figure costs more and not less. On this turnover the newer title bills £55.52 against £52.64 for the older one, a difference of £2.88 going the wrong way for the reader with the bigger feature.
Every fourth wild on the original retriggers at 2x, 3x or 10x, on a five by three grid with money symbols up to 2,000x. None of that changes the percentage either. A mechanic describes how a payback is delivered and the percentage describes how much of it comes back, and only the second of those prices a staked pound.
06
The one feature this studio advertises that a British player cannot buy
Bonus buys are a select markets feature by this studio’s own description, and Great Britain is outside that set. Operators here were warned off them on 17 January 2020, after one game turned out to charge more than £3,000 for entry to a bonus round, and six of the operators contacted dropped the feature. British players are to be treated as having no access to it.
That rule reaches a licensed lobby rather than a studio. The games exist, the studio sells them where it may, and a British-licensed operator is told not to offer the buy-in. A lobby outside the British licence is told nothing of the kind, so the same catalogue can carry a buy-in there.
Which is worth pricing rather than deploring. A buy-in converts a wait into a payment, and on a title published at 96.51 per cent the payment carries the same 3.49p of cost in every pound as any other stake. Nothing about paying for entry improves the percentage, and out here a bought feature counts towards the turnover exactly as a spin does, because it is a slot either way.
Three sheets alongside this one take the rest. New online slots puts the newest dated title against the oldest. Top 20 slots UK orders twenty of them on the only number that will order anything. Online slots UK turns this turnover into presses of start and into hours. The heading they all sit under is what you play.
07
One studio’s whole range against one of its own ladders
Seven lines. Floor, match and multiple are the terms these cashiers set; the first pair of percentages are the highest and lowest this studio publishes; the second pair are the headline and lowest setting of one title.
£40.00 of credit, across one catalogue
- Credit a top opening match returns 200% of £20.00 = £40.00
- Turnover the multiple of forty asks £40.00 × 40 = £1,600.00
- Bill on the studio’s highest published figure £1,600.00 × 0.0329 = £52.64
- Bill on the studio’s lowest published figure £1,600.00 × 0.0393 = £62.88
- Width of the whole published range £62.88 − £52.64 = £10.24
- Width of one title’s own ladder of settings £86.40 − £52.64 = £33.76
- A pound of bonus, left column then right £1.32 beside £0.33
At a ceiling of ten the turnover is £400.00, so the range narrows to £2.56 and the ladder to £8.44, and a pound of bonus costs £0.33 instead of £1.32. Both figures in the last line are rounded up, from £1.316 and £0.329, so that neither side reads cheaper than it is. Outside the seven lines sit a cap of five times the bonus on what such a package will convert, a seven day window on most of them and a fourteen day one elsewhere, the ceilings in the table above, which carry no published frequency and therefore no price, and variance, because every bill is an expectation struck across a great many spins.
08
Questions about one studio’s reels
- How much does the choice between this studio’s slots matter?
- £10.24 on the credit priced here. Sixteen titles carry published figures between 96.71 per cent and 96.07, a span of 0.64 points, and £1,600.00 of turnover converts that into £10.24. Thirteen of the sixteen sit inside 0.21 of a point of each other, worth £3.36, so the real choice is between two prices rather than sixteen.
- Which of these titles is cheapest to clear a bonus on?
- The three published at 96.71 per cent, at £52.64 across £1,600.00 of turnover against £62.88 for the three published at 96.07. On the assumption that a lobby bought the top of the published range. One of those cheapest titles is also published at 95.67 and at 94.60, where the same turnover costs £69.28 and £86.40.
- Is this studio licensed in Great Britain?
- Its Gibraltar entity holds Gambling Commission account number 56015 and a Gibraltar licence numbered RGL 107, and both are supplier permissions rather than operator ones. A supplier licence governs the games. An operator licence governs the account, the money and the terms, and an offshore cashier holds none.
- Do these slots count towards the wagering on such offers?
- Every title here is a reel, and reels are the whole of what these packages count, their terms differing only in how plainly they say so. Which individual titles a given cashier allows is a question its own terms answer.
- Why did the maximum win keep rising while the payback did not?
- Because the two figures come out of different parts of a game’s design. Across one remake series the ceiling went from 2,100x to 25,000x, a climb of nearly twelve times, while the payback moved from 96.71 per cent to 96.52. The three dearest titles in the whole range, all at 96.07 per cent, were the first to reach a ceiling of 10,000x.
- Are the bigger free spin rounds on newer titles worth anything?
- Not as a discount. The newest title in the series awards fifteen, twenty or twenty-five free spins where three, four or five scatters land, against ten, fifteen or twenty on the first one, and a feature sits inside the published payback rather than beside it. The newer title bills £55.52 on that turnover against £52.64 for the older, so the bigger feature costs £2.88 more.
- Can I buy my way into a feature on one of these slots?
- Not at a British-licensed site. Bonus buys are a select markets feature by this studio’s own description and Great Britain is outside that set, following a warning to operators here on 17 January 2020, when one game turned out to charge more than £3,000 for entry to a bonus round. Six operators contacted at the time removed the feature.
- What does a published volatility tell me here?
- Less than a percentage does, because it is a word rather than a number and multiplies into nothing. One volatility entry for this studio’s headline reel came from a brief rather than a provider page, so no volatility is printed for it anywhere in these pages. A blank field on a provider page is recorded here as a blank and never filled in.
- What would a British licence do to these bills?
- A ceiling of ten would bring the turnover down to £400.00 from £1,600.00, so the whole published range narrows from £10.24 to £2.56 and one title’s own ladder from £33.76 to £8.44. It would also put the installed payback within a reader’s reach before any commitment to gamble. Two licences out of Curacao, one out of Anjouan and one out of Costa Rica carry none of that.